4.5 Article

COVID-19 and protected areas: Impacts, conflicts, and possible management solutions

Journal

CONSERVATION LETTERS
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/conl.12800

Keywords

biodiversity conservation; lockdown; overcrowding; protected areas management; social impacts; visitors; Wales

Funding

  1. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union [802605]
  2. European Research Council (ERC) [802605] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During the COVID-19 pandemic, restrictions on visitors entering Protected Areas had significant social-ecological impacts in Snowdonia National Park. Most respondents viewed the reduction in visitor numbers positively. The preferred options to manage overcrowding included restricting access to certain paths and developing mobile applications to alert people to overcrowding.
During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, management authorities of numerous Protected Areas (PAs) had to discourage visitors from accessing them in order to reduce the virus transmission rate and protect local communities. This resulted in social-ecological impacts and added another layer of complexity to managing PAs. This paper presents the results of a survey in Snowdonia National Park capturing the views of over 700 local residents on the impacts of COVID-19 restrictions and possible scenarios and tools for managing tourist numbers. Lower visitor numbers were seen in a broadly positive way by a significant number of respondents while benefit sharing issues from tourism also emerged. Most preferred options to manage overcrowding were restricting access to certain paths, the development of mobile applications to alert people to overcrowding and reporting irresponsible behavior. Our findings are useful for PA managers and local communities currently developing post-COVID-19 recovery strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available