4.6 Article

Risk Stratification With the Use of Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography in Patients With Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Journal

JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages 2186-2195

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.03.019

Keywords

computed tomographic angiography; nonobstructive coronary artery disease; risk stratification

Funding

  1. National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland [R01HL098237, R01HL098236, R01HL098305, R01HL098235]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) [TA 1438/1-2]
  3. National Institutes of Health [K24HL113128]
  4. National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [T32 HL076136]
  5. Nvidia Corporation Academic Program
  6. AstraZeneca
  7. Kowa
  8. American Heart Association Precision Medicine Institute [18UNPG34030172]
  9. Harvard University Center for AIDS Research [NIH/NIAID 5P30AI060354-14]
  10. American Heart Association [13FTF16450001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed a risk prediction model for patients with nonobstructive CAD and found that advanced coronary plaque features have incremental value in discriminating clinical events in low-risk stable chest pain patients. ASCVD risk, degree of stenosis, and presence of HRP features independently predicted composite events in patients with nonobstructive CAD, improving model fit significantly. Patients with ASCVD >= 7.5%, any HRP, and mild/moderate stenosis had significantly higher rates of events compared to those who did not meet those criteria.
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to develop a risk prediction model for patients with nonobstructive CAD. BACKGROUND Among stable chest pain patients, most cardiovascular (CV) events occur in those with nonobstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Thus, developing tailored risk prediction approaches in this group of patients, including CV risk factors and CAD characteristics, is needed. METHODS In PROMISE (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain) computed tomographic angiography patients, a core laboratory assessed prevalence of CAD (nonobstructive 1% to 49% left main or 1% to 69% stenosis any coronary artery), degree of stenosis (minimal: 1% to 29%; mild: 30% to 49%; or moderate: 50% to 69%), high-risk plaque (HRP) features (positive remodeling, low-attenuation plaque, and napkin-ring sign), segment involvement score (SIS), and coronary artery calcium (CAC). The primary end point was an adjudicated composite of unstable angina pectoris, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and death. Cox regression analysis determined independent predictors in nonobstructive CAD. RESULTS Of 2,890 patients (age 61.7 years, 46% women) with any CAD, 90.4% (n = 2,614) had nonobstructive CAD (mean age 61.6 yrs, 46% women, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease [ASCVD] risk 16.2%). Composite events were independently predicted by ASCVD risk (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.03; p = 0.001), degree of stenosis (30% to 69%; HR: 1.91; p = 0.011), and presence of >= 2 HRP features (HR: 2.40; p = 0.008). Addition of >= 2 HRP features to: 1) ASCVD and CAC; 2) ASCVD and SIS; or 3) ASCVD and degree of stenosis resulted in a statistically significant improvement in model fit (p = 0.0036; p = 0.0176; and p = 0.0318; respectively). Patients with ASCVD >= 7.5%, any HRP, and mild/moderate stenosis had significantly higher event rates than those who did not meet those criteria (3.0% vs. 6.2%; p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS Advanced coronary plaque features have incremental value over total plaque burden for the discrimination of clinical events in low-risk stable chest pain patients with nonobstructive CAD. This may be a first step to improve prevention in this cohort with the highest absolute risk for CV events. (C) 2021 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available