4.5 Review Book Chapter

Modeling Food Particle Systems: A Review of Current Progress and Challenges

Publisher

ANNUAL REVIEWS
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-121820-081524

Keywords

computer-aided engineering; flowability; size reduction; drying; granulation; food powders

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Food engineers have long tried to describe physical phenomena in food through mathematical models, but the use of computer-aided engineering in the food industry is still relatively less established. The complexity of food matrices is a major reason for this gap. Modeling food particle systems can help researchers address challenges, but further attention is needed especially related to physics-based contact models for discrete-element models of food particle systems.
For many years, food engineers have attempted to describe physical phenomena such as heat and mass transfer in food via mathematical models. Still, the impact and benefits of computer-aided engineering are less established in food than in most other industries today. Complexity in the structure and composition of food matrices are largely responsible for this gap. During processing of food, its temperature, moisture, and structure can change continuously, along with its physical properties. We summarize the knowledge foundation, recent progress, and remaining limitations in modeling food particle systems in four relevant areas: flowability, size reduction, drying, and granulation and agglomeration. Our goal is to enable researchers in academia and industry dealing with food powders to identify approaches to address their challenges with adequate model systems or through structural and compositional simplifications. With advances in computer simulation capacity, detailed particle-scale models are now available for many applications. Here, we discuss aspects that require further attention, especially related to physics-based contact models for discrete-element models of food particle systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available