4.6 Article

Genetic Diversity of Rice stripe necrosis virus and New Insights into Evolution of the Genus Benyvirus

Journal

VIRUSES-BASEL
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v13050737

Keywords

RSNV; benyvirus; diversity; recombination

Categories

Funding

  1. Universite Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain)
  2. Move-In Louvain postdoctoral fellowship of the UCLouvain
  3. CONICET
  4. CGIAR Research Program on Rice (CRP RICE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the genetic diversity of the rice stripe necrosis virus (RSNV) and found unexpected differences with the beet necrotic yellow vein virus (BNYVV), suggesting a complex evolutionary history of the genus Benyvirus. The RSNV molecular diversity had a geographical structure with two main RSNV lineages distributed in America and in Africa.
The rice stripe necrosis virus (RSNV) has been reported to infect rice in several countries in Africa and South America, but limited genomic data are currently publicly available. Here, eleven RSNV genomes were entirely sequenced, including the first corpus of RSNV genomes of African isolates. The genetic variability was differently distributed along the two genomic segments. The segment RNA1, within which clusters of polymorphisms were identified, showed a higher nucleotidic variability than did the beet necrotic yellow vein virus (BNYVV) RNA1 segment. The diversity patterns of both viruses were similar in the RNA2 segment, except for an in-frame insertion of 243 nucleotides located in the RSNV tgbp1 gene. Recombination events were detected into RNA1 and RNA2 segments, in particular in the two most divergent RSNV isolates from Colombia and Sierra Leone. In contrast to BNYVV, the RSNV molecular diversity had a geographical structure with two main RSNV lineages distributed in America and in Africa. Our data on the genetic diversity of RSNV revealed unexpected differences with BNYVV suggesting a complex evolutionary history of the genus Benyvirus.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available