4.1 Article

COVID-19 and air pollution in Vienna-a time series approach

Journal

WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT
Volume 133, Issue 17-18, Pages 951-957

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00508-021-01881-4

Keywords

SARS-CoV-2; Infection risk; Nitrogen dioxide; Particulate matter; Acute effects

Funding

  1. Medical University of Vienna

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that there is a positive correlation between nitrogen dioxide and PM10 concentration in the air and the risk of COVID-19 infection, with nitrogen dioxide having a significant impact on infection risk while particles do not. However, these pollutants do not affect COVID-19-related mortality. This suggests a potential interaction between air pollution and infectious agents.
We performed a time series analysis in Vienna, Austria, investigating the temporal association between daily air pollution (nitrogen dioxide, NO2 and particulate matter smaller than 10 mu m, PM10) concentration and risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and death. Data covering about 2 months (March-April 2020) were retrieved from public databases. Infection risk was defined as the ratio between infected and infectious. In a separate sensitivity analysis different models were applied to estimate the number of infectious people per day. The impact of air pollution was assessed through a linear regression on the natural logarithm of infection risk. Risk of COVID-19 mortality was estimated by Poisson regression. Both pollutants were positively correlated with the risk of infection with the coefficient for NO2 being 0.032 and for PM10 0.014. That association was significant for the irritant gas (p = 0.012) but not for particles (p = 0.22). Pollutants did not affect COVID-19-related mortality. The study findings might have wider implications on an interaction between air pollution and infectious agents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available