4.2 Review

Adolescents' Perceived Drinking Norms Toward Alcohol Misuse: An Integrative Review

Journal

WESTERN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH
Volume 44, Issue 5, Pages 477-492

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0193945921998376

Keywords

peer; drinking intention; drinking patterns; subjective norms; descriptive norms

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This integrative review synthesized prior research on how adolescents' perceived drinking norms from parents, peers, and media influence their drinking intentions and behaviors. It found that these norms significantly impact adolescents' decisions and behaviors regarding alcohol consumption. The results suggest that interventions should target both subjective norms from interpersonal relationships and descriptive norms from media exposure in order to effectively address underage drinking issues.
The purpose of this integrative review is to synthesize prior research on the relationship between adolescents' perceived subjective and descriptive drinking norms and their drinking intention and behaviors. Four databases (CINAHL, PubMed, Cochrane, and Sociological Abstracts) were searched to identify relevant articles. Thirty-one peer-reviewed articles published from 2010 to 2020 were reviewed. The results highlight that adolescents' perceived drinking norms derived from their parents and peers, such as approving or disapproving attitudes, significantly influence adolescents' drinking intention and behaviors. Moreover, pro-drinking messages, advertisements, and postings from electronic media (i.e., TV, movies, and the Internet) and online social networks (e.g., Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter) shape adolescents' drinking intention and encourage adolescents to initiate alcohol consumption early and/or escalate their drinking. Thus, future interventions should focus on subjective drinking norms that stem from interpersonal relationships in combination with perceived descriptive drinking norms derived from various media exposure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available