Journal
WATER RESEARCH
Volume 194, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2021.116924
Keywords
Aquaporin; Micropollutants; Biomimetic forward osmosis; Laboratory study; Pilot Study
Funding
- BONUS CLEANWATER project from BONUS (Art 185) - EU
- Innovation Fund Denmark
- Sweden's innovation agency VINNOVA
- German Ministry for Education and Science (BMBF)
- Aarhus Center for Water Technology (WATEC)
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Aquaporin-based forward osmosis (AQP FO) membranes were used in laboratory and pilot-scale experiments to remove micropollutants from water. Results showed high rejection rates for most micropollutants, with only a few compounds passing through the membrane to some extent. The study demonstrated the effectiveness of the AQP FO system in removing micropollutants from water.
Aquaporin-based forward osmosis (AQP FO) membranes were applied both in laboratory-and pilot-scale for removing micropollutants from water. The effect of operating parameters (feed flow, draw flow, and transmembrane pressure) on the i) rejection of micropollutants, ii) water flux, iii) reverse salt flux, and iv) water recovery of the AQP FO membrane modules was studied. Among the 21 micropollutants spiked, only four compounds, atenolol, propranolol, metoprolol, and citalopram, permeated through the AQP FO membranes to an extent that they could be quantified in the draw solutions of both the laboratory and pilot systems. The rejection rates, based on the full mass balance calculations, were between 96.1% and 99.7%, and all the other 17 compounds showed rejection exceeding 90% on both systems. The pilot AQP FO system was further employed for six days to treat effluent from a membrane bioreactor (MBR) treating municipal wastewater. 35 micropollutants were investigated. 27 of these were identified and quantified in the MBR effluent. Minute fractions of gabapentin, benzotriazole, and metoprolol were detected passing through the AQP FO membranes into the draw side with a constant rejection of around 99.2%, 95.4%, and 99.9%. Almost all other micropollutants? minimum rejection rates exceeded 80%. ? 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available