4.7 Article

Effect of feeding practices and manure quality on CH4 and N2O emissions from uncovered cattle manure heaps in Kenya

Journal

WASTE MANAGEMENT
Volume 126, Issue -, Pages 209-220

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.03.014

Keywords

Solid storage; Napier; Rhodes; Brachiaria; Greenhouse gases; Sub-Saharan Africa

Funding

  1. International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) [2000000994, 2017.0119.2]
  2. CGIAR Fund Council, Australia (ACIAR)
  3. Irish Aid
  4. European Union
  5. IFAD, the Netherlands, New Zealand, UK
  6. USAID and Thailand

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study shows that IPCC emission factors overestimate greenhouse gas emissions from smallholder livestock systems in sub-Saharan Africa, calling for additional measurements to develop localized emission factors.
Countries in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) rely on IPCC emission factors (EF) for GHG emission reporting. However, these were derived for industrialized livestock farms and do not represent conditions of smallholder farms (small, low-producing livestock breeds, poor feed quality, feed scarcity). Here, we present the first measurements of CH4 and N2O emissions from cattle-manure heaps representing feeding practices typical for smallholder farms in the highlands of East Africa: 1) cattle fed below maintenance energy requirements to represent feed scarcity, and 2) cattle fed tropical forage grasses (Napier, Rhodes, Brachiaria). Sub-maintenance feeding reduced cumulative manure N2O emissions compared to cattle receiving sufficient feed but did not change EFN2O. Sub-maintenance feeding did not affect cumulative manure CH4 emissions or EFCH4. When cattle were fed tropical forage grasses, cumulative manure N2O emissions did not differ between diets, but manure EFN2O from Brachiaria and Rhodes diets were lower than the IPCC EFN2O for solid storage (1%, 2019 Refinement of IPCC Guidelines). Manure CH4 emissions were lower in the Rhodes grass diet than when feeding Napier or Brachiaria, and manure EFCH4 from all three grasses were lower than the IPCC default (4.4 g CH4 kg(-1) VS, 2019 Refinement of IPCC Guidelines). Regression analysis revealed that manure N concentration and C:N were important drivers of N2O emissions, with low N concentrations and high C:N reducing N2O emissions. Our results show that IPCC EFs overestimate excreta GHG emissions, which calls for additional measurements to develop localized EFs for smallholder livestock systems in SSA. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available