4.5 Article

A half-century of meningococcal vaccines

Journal

VACCINE
Volume 39, Issue 17, Pages 2475-2478

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.03.024

Keywords

Meningococcal polysaccharide; Conjugate vaccines

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The first safe and effective vaccine for invasive meningococcal disease was developed 50 years ago, utilizing polysaccharide capsular antigen. Subsequent advancements in vaccine technology led to the development of more effective vaccines against other meningococcus serogroups. These novel vaccines have had a significant global impact on invasive meningococcal disease, paving the way for future vaccine efforts against other infectious threats.
The first safe and effective vaccine for the prevention of invasive meningococcal disease was created fifty years ago. The vaccine employed a novel platform, polysaccharide capsular antigen, based on the discovery that anticapsular antibody conferred protective immunity in humans. As with most new paradigms in vaccinology, it derived from important basic research from other scientific disciplines over the preceding years. The success of the first monovalent polysaccharide vaccine in nearly eliminating invasive meningococcal disease in military settings led to accelerated advances in polysaccharide vaccine development against other serogroups of meningococcus and other encapsulated pathogens. As gaps in vaccine efficacy arose over the past half-century, new vaccine technologies and approaches were developed to address the challenges. Several of these, including conjugate vaccines and reverse vaccinology led to other novel, successful vaccines that have had a significant, favorable global impact on invasive meningococcal disease. The history of meningococcal vaccine discovery may provide insights into the future of vaccine efforts against other infectious threats. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available