4.7 Article

Analysis of urban green space accessibility and distribution inequity in the City of Chicago

Journal

URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING
Volume 59, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127029

Keywords

Distribution inequity; Palma ratio; Two-Step floating catchment area method; Urban green space

Funding

  1. Marion G. Russell Graduate Fellowship from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  2. Hong Kong Research Grants Council (RGC) General Research Fund [14605920]
  3. Research Committee on Research Sustainability of Major RGC Funding Schemes of the Chinese University of Hong Kong
  4. RGC Postdoctoral Fellowship from the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong [PDFS2021-4S08]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Urban green space has positive impacts on physical and mental health, but studies suggest disparities in access to UGS among different racial/ethnic and income groups. White-majority census tracts generally have better UGS accessibility compared to minority-dominated tracts, with black-majority tracts having higher accessibility than Hispanic-majority tracts. There is also income-based UGS accessibility inequality within racial/ethnic groups, with the most inequity found in black-majority census tracts.
Urban green space (UGS) has positive impacts on people?s physical and mental health. Equal access to UGS for all people, regardless of their individual characteristics, is key to the achievement of better public health outcomes. Existing studies have focused largely on inequity in spatial UGS accessibility distribution but failed to uncover the disparities of UGS accessibility among different racial/ethnic and income groups as well as inequity in income-based UGS accessibility distribution within the same racial/ethnic groups. By using the city of Chicago as the study area, we adopt the two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method to measure census tract-level UGS accessibility and compare distribution disparities among white-majority, black-majority and Hispanic-majority census tracts as well as low-income and non-low-income census tracts. In addition, we employ the Palma ratio to measure the income-based UGS accessibility distribution inequity within respective racial/ethnic groups. The results show that white-majority census tracts generally enjoy significantly better UGS accessibility than minority-dominated census tracts, while black-majority census tracts have higher UGS accessibility than Hispanic-majority census tracts. In terms of the intra-racial/ethnic income-based UGS accessibility inequity between the richest and the poorest, inequity is the lowest among white-majority census tracts and the highest among black-majority census tracts, with inequity in Hispanic-majority census tracts in the intermediate range.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available