4.4 Article

Dimensionality reduction and unsupervised clustering for EELS-SI

Journal

ULTRAMICROSCOPY
Volume 231, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2021.113314

Keywords

Electron energy loss spectroscopy; Spectrum imaging; Cluster analysis; Dimensionality reduction

Categories

Funding

  1. Seoul National University
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIT) [2017R1A2B3011629, 2020R1A5A6017701]
  3. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. [IO210201-08359-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel combination of machine learning algorithms is proposed for differentiation of distinct spectra in a large electron energy loss spectroscopy spectrum image dataset. By utilizing dimensionality reduction and clustering techniques, specific spectra with fine structures were successfully differentiated.
A novel combination of machine learning algorithms is proposed for the differentiation of distinct spectra in a large electron energy loss spectroscopy spectrum image (EELS-SI) dataset. For clustering of the EEL spectra including similar fine structures in an efficient space, linear and nonlinear dimensionality reduction methods are used to project the EEL spectra onto a low-dimensional space. Then, a density-based clustering algorithm is applied to distinguish the meaningful data clusters. By applying this strategy to various experimental EELS-SI datasets, differentiation of several groups of EEL spectra representing specific fine structures was achieved. It is possible to investigate particular fine structures by averaging all of the spectra in each cluster. Also, the spatial distributions of each cluster in the scanning regions can be observed, which enables investigation of the locations of different fine structures in materials. This method does not require any prior knowledge, i.e., it is a data-driven analysis; therefore, it can be applied to any hyperspectral image.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available