4.5 Article

Renal allograft DARCness in subclinical acute and chronic active ABMR

Journal

TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL
Volume 34, Issue 8, Pages 1494-1505

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/tri.13904

Keywords

antibody-mediated rejection; Duffy antigen receptor for chemokines; immunohistochemistry gene expression profiling; kidney transplantation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study revealed that upregulation of DARC protein is associated with antibody-mediated rejection in renal allografts, but is not specific as a diagnostic marker, and does not correlate with graft survival rates.
Gene expression profiling of renal allograft biopsies revealed the Duffy antigen receptor for chemokines (DARC) as being strikingly upregulated in antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). DARC has previously been shown to be associated with endothelial injury. This study aimed at assessing the value of DARC immunohistochemistry as diagnostic marker in ABMR. The study was performed on 82 prospectively collected biopsies of a clinically well-defined population (BORTEJECT trial, NCT01873157) of DSA-positive patients with gene expression data available for all biopsies. Diagnostic histologic assessment of biopsies was performed according to the Banff diagnostic scheme. DARC expression was focally accentuated, on peritubular capillaries (PTC) mostly in areas of interstitial fibrosis and/or inflammation. DARC positivity was associated with diagnosis of ABMR and correlated with DARC gene expression levels detected by microarray analysis. Still, as previously described, a substantial number of biopsies without signs of rejection showed DARC-positive PTC. We did not observe significantly reduced graft survival in cases showing histologic signs of ABMR and being DARC-positive, as compared to DARC-negative ABMR. In summary, the upregulation of DARC, detected by immunohistochemistry, is associated with but not specific for ABMR. We did not observe reduced graft survival in DARC-positive patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available