4.5 Article

Critical Evaluation of Low-Molecular Wight Respiratory Sensitizers and Their Protein Reactivity Potential Toward Lysine Residues

Journal

TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 182, Issue 2, Pages 346-354

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfab055

Keywords

respiratory sensitization; in chemico; DPRA; peptide reactivity

Categories

Funding

  1. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) project AeroSafe [031L0128D]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research on methods to evaluate the respiratory sensitization potential of low-molecular weight chemicals is hindered by a lack of chemical reference standards and uncertainty about relevant immunological mechanisms. The formation of stable adducts of the chemical with host proteins is the first key event in the development of either skin or respiratory sensitization.
Interest in the development of methods to evaluate the respiratory sensitization potential of low-molecular weight chemicals continues, but no method has yet been generally accepted or validated. A lack of chemical reference standards, together with uncertainty regarding relevant immunological mechanisms, has hampered method development. The first key event in the development of either skin or respiratory sensitization is the formation of stable adducts of the chemical with host proteins. This event is measured in the Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay using cysteine- and lysine-containing model peptides. It is hypothesized that protein reactivity and subsequent adduct formation may represent the earliest point of divergence in the pathways leading to either skin or respiratory sensitization. Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay data for 200 chemicals were compiled and grouped into respiratory, skin and nonsensitizers. Chemicals grouping was based on extensive literature research and expert judgment. To evaluate if chemical groups represent different peptide reactivity profiles, peptide reactivity data were clustered and compared with information on protein binding mechanisms and chemical categories available via the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Toolbox. Respiratory sensitizers (n = 15) showed a significant (3-fold) higher lysine reactivity than skin sensitizers (n = 129). However, this difference was driven largely by the high representation of acid anhydrides among the respiratory sensitizers that showed clear lysine selectivity. Collectively, these data suggest that preferential reactivity for either cysteine or lysine is associated primarily with chemical structure, and that lysine preference is not a unifying characteristic of chemical respiratory allergens.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available