4.7 Article

Mechanical and fracture properties of geopolymer concrete with basalt fiber using digital image correlation

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2021.102909

Keywords

Fly ash geopolymer concrete (FAGC); Basalt fiber; Mechanical properties; Fracture properties; Digital image correlation

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC0401902]
  2. State Key Program of National Natural Science of China [51739008]
  3. National Major Scientific Instruments Development Project of China [51527811]
  4. Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute [Y17017, Y17015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the mechanical and fracture properties of basalt fiber reinforced fly ash geopolymer concrete with different fiber lengths, and found that the 6 mm fiber reinforced concrete exhibited the best performance. Before reaching the 80% peak load level, a decrease in crack length and an improvement in relative COD increment were observed in the basalt fiber reinforced concrete.
This paper investigates the mechanical and fracture properties of basalt fiber reinforced fly ash geopolymer concrete with different length (3 mm, 6 mm, 12 mm and 18 mm), which were tested by means of compressive strength test, splitting tensile strength test and three point bending test. The fiber reinforced mechanism was characterized by SEM. Simultaneously, the strain field and displacement field of FAGC were explored by using of digital image correlation. The results reveal that the addition of basalt fiber improve compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, peak load, fracture toughness and fracture energy, and all of them for fiber reinforced FAGC with 6 mm were biggest. In addition, a decrease in crack length and an improvement in relative COD increment for basalt fiber reinforced FAGC before the load level of post-80% peak load were observed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available