The Use of Mobile Messaging for Telecommunications with Patients in Ophthalmology: A Systematic Review

Background: Communication and concordance between patients and providers are crucial for improved outcomes and disease prevention. Mobile health strategies have been shown to improve patient accessibility and convenience. Mobile messaging is one strategy that has demonstrated varying degrees of effectiveness in patient care. The aim of this review is to investigate methods, outcomes, and conclusions of studies that have assessed mobile messaging interventions in ophthalmology. Methods: A qualitative systematic review of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases was conducted to identify studies that investigated the implementation and efficacy of mobile messaging services in ophthalmology practice. Included articles were categorized based on study content: appointment attendance, patient preference and willingness, education, concordance, and other clinical outcomes. Three tools were used to assess for potential bias. Results: Out of a total of 3,655 unique titles retrieved, 15 articles were included in the final qualitative synthesis after abstract and full-text screening. Included studies were published between 2008 and 2020 from seven different countries and across various contexts. All but one study found that the use of mobile messaging in ophthalmology care led to improved process measures or patient outcomes. Evidence for a positive effect was the strongest for appointment follow-up. Survey and feedback data suggest that patients, more so younger patients, are open to mobile message interventions. Conclusion: Mobile messaging interventions can play a role in improving appointment attendance, patient education, and patient practices for ophthalmology patients. Further study is necessary to determine the effectiveness of this tool across various groups and settings.

Automated summary

Mobile messaging interventions in ophthalmology care have been shown to improve appointment attendance, patient education, and patient practices, especially among younger patients. Further research is needed to assess the effectiveness of this tool in different populations and settings.