Journal
TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Volume 60, Issue 3, Pages 401-404Publisher
ELSEVIER TAIWAN
DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2021.03.004
Keywords
Routine ultrasonography; Prenatal diagnosis; Fetal growth restriction; Fetal abnormalities; Induction of labour
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The debate on third trimester ultrasound in obstetrics continues, with no consensus on its effectiveness and value. There is currently no evidence to suggest that it improves perinatal outcomes, and health policies in the US and Europe have not been updated accordingly.
Third trimester ultrasound has long been in obstetrics a topic of debate. This issue is framed in a historical debate on the effectiveness of routine obstetrical ultrasound and two opposing trends originated in America and Europe, respectively. Primary function of this ultrasound has been to detect fetal growth restriction, but no study has shown evidence of improving perinatal outcomes. Other secondary functions are detection of fetal abnormalities or evaluation of fetal presentation, and they have also shown no evidence. Despite the continuous appearance of works in this regard, health policies of both american and european trends have not been modified. Future seems to show a prolongation of the stalemate. Those health systems with a universal third trimester policy should propose an optimization of the test, in order to improve the benefits and obtain data for future studies that could resolve this longstanding debate. (c) 2021 Taiwan Association of Obstetrics & Gynecology. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available