4.6 Article

Extended cognition, assistive technology and education

Journal

SYNTHESE
Volume 199, Issue 3-4, Pages 8355-8377

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-021-03166-9

Keywords

Extended cognition; Epistemology; Education; Assistive technology; Epistemology; of education; Disability; Cognitive impairment; Cognitive augmentation

Funding

  1. Eidyn research centre
  2. University of Edinburgh's School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences
  3. The Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The research focuses on whether the use of assistive technology in special needs education can be considered a form of extended cognition, suggesting that the relationship between students and AT is more than just instrumental. It is argued that special needs education provides a particularly plausible case for extended cognition, with important philosophical and practical implications for mainstream education in technologically-rich environments.
Assistive technology (AT) is widely used in contemporary special needs education. Our interest is in the extent to which we can conceive of certain uses of AT in this educational context as a form of extended cognition. It is argued that what is critical to answering this question is that the relationship between the student and the AT is more than just that of subject-and-instrument, but instead incorporates a fluidity and spontaneity that puts it on a functional par with their use of the student's biological cognitive traits. It is claimed that AT use in special needs education offers an especially plausible case of extended cognition for just this reason. It is further maintained that understanding AT in this fashion has some important philosophical and practical ramifications, including how we should conceive of mainstream education, given that this is increasingly conducted within highly technologically-embedded environments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available