4.6 Article

Propensity score-matched comparison of the oncological feasibility and survival outcomes for pancreatic adenocarcinoma with robotic and open pancreatoduodenectomy

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08437-7

Keywords

Oncological; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Propensity score; Robotic; Survival

Categories

Funding

  1. Biobank of Taipei Veterans General Hospital
  2. Taipei Veterans General Hospital [V110B-023, V110C-010, V110C-011]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology [MOST 108-2314-B-075-051-MY3]
  4. Ministry of Health and Welfare [MOHW107-TDU-B-212-114026A]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While RPD showed better outcomes in terms of surgical time, blood loss, complications, and postoperative delayed gastric emptying, it had similar oncological outcomes in terms of lymph node yield and 5-year survival rate compared to OPD. The study suggests that RPD is technically feasible and oncologically justifiable for pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients.
Background This study is to clarify the feasibility of and justification for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Methods A 1-to-1 propensity score-matched comparison of RPD and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) was performed based on six covariates commonly used to predict the survival outcome for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Results A total of 130 patients were enrolled, with 65 in each study group after propensity score matching. The median operating time was longer for RPD (8.3 h vs. 7.0 h, P = 0.002). However, RPD was associated with less blood loss, lower overall surgical complication rate, and lower incidence of delayed gastric emptying. The resection radicality was oncologically similar between these two groups, but the median lymph node yield was higher for RPD (18 vs. 16, P = 0.038). Before propensity score matching, the 5-year survival was better in RPD (27.0% vs. 17.6%, P = 0.006). After matching, there was still a trend towards improved overall survival in the RPD group; however, the difference in 5-year survival between RPD and OPD was not significant (24.5% vs. 19.7%, P = 0.088). Conclusion RPD is not only technically feasible with no increase in surgical risk but also oncologically justifiable without compromising survival outcome. However, unlike randomized control trials, the limitations in this propensity score-matched analysis only accounted for 6 observed covariates commonly used to predict the survival outcome in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and confounders not included in this study could also affect our results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available