4.3 Article

Intestinal mucosa staple line integrity and anastomotic leak pressure after healing in a porcine model

Journal

SURGERY TODAY
Volume 51, Issue 10, Pages 1713-1719

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00595-021-02267-9

Keywords

Stapler; Anastomosis; Leak pressure; Mucosal suture; Porcine model

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to evaluate the integrity of intestinal mucosa staple lines and anastomotic leak pressure in a porcine survival model. The results showed that the leak pressure on day 0 was associated with the integrity of the staple lines, but there was no correlation at two days or more postoperatively.Histological findings in both groups showed similar healing at postoperative days 2 and 7.
Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate both the intestinal mucosa staple line integrity and anastomotic leak pressure after healing in a porcine survival model. Methods We used two suture models using two different size staples (incomplete mucosal closure model: group G [staple height 0.75 mm], complete mucosal closure model: group B [staple height 1.5 mm]) in the porcine ileum. Five staple lines were created in each group made in the ileum for each model, and the staple sites harvested on days 0, 2, and 7. The leak pressure at the staple site was measured at each time point. Results On day 0, the leak pressure for group G (79.5 mmHg) was significantly lower than that for group B (182.3 mmHg) (p < 0.01). On days 2 and 7, there was no significant difference between groups G and B (171 mmHg and 175.5 mmHg on day 2, 175.5 mmHg and 175.5 mmHg on day 7, p > 0.05). The histological findings in both groups showed similar healing at postoperative days 2 and 7. Conclusion The integrity of the mucosal staple lines was associated with the postoperative leak pressure on day 0. However, there was no association with the leak pressure at two days or more postoperatively in a porcine model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available