4.6 Article

Machine learning analyses of automated performance metrics during granular sub-stitch phases predict surgeon experience

Journal

SURGERY
Volume 169, Issue 5, Pages 1245-1249

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.09.020

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering of the National Institutes of Health [K23EB026493]
  2. Intuitive Surgical Clinical Research Grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Automated performance metrics during vesico-urethral anastomosis can accurately distinguish surgeon expertise, with sub-stitch level measurements providing more accurate classification than summary metrics over whole stitches.
Automated performance metrics objectively measure surgeon performance during a robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Machine learning has demonstrated that automated performance metrics, especially during the vesico-urethral anastomosis of the robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, are predictive of long-term outcomes such as continence recovery time. This study focuses on automated performance metrics during the vesico-urethral anastomosis, specifically on stitch versus sub-stitch levels, to distinguish surgeon experience. During the vesico-urethral anastomosis, automated performance metrics, recorded by a systems data recorder (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA), were reported for each overall stitch (C(tota)l) and its individual components: needle handling/targeting (C-1), needle driving (C-2), and suture cinching (C-3) (Fig 1, A). These metrics were organized into three datasets (GlobalSet [whole stitch], RowSet [independent sub-stitches], and ColumnSet [associated sub-stitches] (Fig 1, B) and applied to three machine learning models (AdaBoost, gradient boosting, and random forest) to solve two classifications tasks: experts (>= 100 cases) versus novices (<100 cases) and ordinary experts (>= 100 and <2,000 cases) versus super experts (>= 2,000 cases). Classification accuracy was determined using analysis of variance. Input features were evaluated through a Jaccard index. From 68 vesico-urethral anastomoses, we analyzed 1,570 stitches broken down into 4,708 sub-stitches. For both classification tasks, ColumnSet best distinguished experts (n = 8) versus novices (n = 9) and ordinary experts (n = 5) versus super experts (n = 3) at an accuracy of 0.774 and 0.844, respectively. Feature ranking highlighted Endowrist articulation and needle handling/targeting as most important in classifica-tion. Surgeon performance measured by automated performance metrics on a granular sub-stitch level more accurately distinguishes expertise when compared with summary automated performance metrics over whole stitches. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available