4.7 Article

Effect of shot peening intensity on surface integrity of 18CrNiMo7-6 steel

Journal

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
Volume 421, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.127194

Keywords

Shot peening intensity; Surface roughness; Micro-hardness; Residual stress; Material microstructure

Funding

  1. Key Project of Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing [cstc2019jcyj-zdxmX0007]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program [2020YFB2008200]
  3. State Education Ministry
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2019 CDJSK 04 XK23]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The surface integrity of components treated by shot peening is influenced by shot peening process, procedure, and machine parameters. The intensity is mainly affected by shot diameter, air pressure, and shot flow rate. With increasing intensity, the maximum compressive residual stress and surface hardness increase linearly.
The surface integrity of components treated by shot peening is determined by many influencing factors, which are generally divided into shot peening process parameter, procedure parameter and machine parameter. To understand the influencing relationship of these parameters, and thereby obtain the appropriate peening intensity for the engineering practice, this study experimentally examined the effect of different shot peening parameters on the peening intensity, and further explored the influence of which on surface integrity parameters of carburized steel rollers. It is found that the intensity is mainly affected by the shot diameter (36.73%), air pressure (32.07%) and shot flow rate (23.11%). The maximum compressive residual stress and surface hardness increase linearly as the intensity increases, reaching -1250 MPa and 785 HV at the intensity of 0.55 mmA, respectively. Surface roughness parameter Sq can be used to predict the surface hardness due to the approximately linear relationship between them.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available