4.7 Article

Investigating GIPR (ant)agonism: A structural analysis of GIP and its receptor

Journal

STRUCTURE
Volume 29, Issue 7, Pages 679-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2021.04.001

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Antag Theareutics ApS
  2. Novo Nordisk Foundation [NNF18CC0034900]
  3. Carlsberg Foundation [CF18-0631]
  4. deceased Valter Alex Torbjorn Eichmuller
  5. Kirsten and Freddy Johansens Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigates the structure and function of the GIP receptor (GIPR) and identifies key residues involved in ligand binding and receptor activation. The findings suggest that disrupting a specific salt bridge by GIPR antagonists can significantly reduce GIPR activation, providing insights for rational ligand design targeting the GIPR.
The glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is a 42-residue metabolic hormone that is actively being targeted for its regulatory role of glycemia and energy balance. Limited structural data of its receptor has made ligand design tedious. This study investigates the structure and function of the GIP receptor (GIPR), using a homology model based on the GLP-1 receptor. Molecular dynamics combined with in vitro mutational data were used to pinpoint residues involved in ligand binding and/or receptor activation. Significant differences in binding mode were identified for the naturally occurring agonists GIP(1-30) NH2 and GIP(1-42) compared with high potency antagonists GIP(3-30)NH2 and GIP(5-30)NH2. Residues R183(2.60), R190(2.67), and R300(5.40) are shown to be key for activation of the GIPR, and evidence suggests that a disruption of the K293(ECL2)-E362(ECL3) salt bridge by GIPR antagonists strongly reduces GIPR activation. Combinatorial use of these findings can benefit rational design of ligands targeting the GIPR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available