4.7 Review

A review of structural health monitoring of bonded structures using electromechanical impedance spectroscopy

Journal

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1475921721993419

Keywords

Structural health monitoring; electromechanical impedance spectroscopy; piezoelectric wafer active sensors; damage algorithms; adhesive joints

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electromechanical impedance spectroscopy utilizes piezoelectric elements to create high-frequency structural vibrations for monitoring structural changes. The article presents mathematical models, algorithms, and methods for detecting, localizing, and characterizing damage, but the technology is not mature enough for real-world applications.
The article presents a literature review of electromechanical impedance spectroscopy for structural health monitoring, with emphasis in adhesively bonded joints. The concept behind electromechanical impedance spectroscopy is to use variable high-frequency structural vibrations with piezoelectric elements to monitor the local area of a structure for changes in mechanical impedance that may indicate imminent damage. Various mathematical models that correlate the structural impedance with the electric response of the piezoelectric sensors are presented. Several algorithms and metrics are introduced to detect, localize, and characterize damage when using electromechanical impedance spectroscopy. Applications of electromechanical impedance spectroscopy to study adhesive joints are described. Research and development of alternative hardware for electromechanical impedance spectroscopy is presented. The article ends by presenting future prospects and research of electromechanical impedance spectroscopy-based structural health monitoring, and, while advances have been made in algorithms for damage detection, localization, and characterization, this technology is not mature enough for real-world applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available