Journal
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages 1395-1412Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0962280221998409
Keywords
Mediation; ill-defined interventions; interventional effects; natural effects; target trial; multiple mediators; randomised controlled trial; causal inference
Categories
Funding
- Australian Research Council [DE190101326]
- University of Melbourne
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol, England
- Victorian Government's Operational Infrastructure Support Program
- Australian Research Council [DE190101326] Funding Source: Australian Research Council
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This passage discusses epidemiological research on interventions to change the pathways of associations and proposes a novel framework for addressing methodological challenges in studying mediation effects. The focus is on simulating hypothetical interventions targeting multiple mediators and evaluating their impact, with an example application in the Victorian Adolescent Health Cohort Study.
Many epidemiological questions concern potential interventions to alter the pathways presumed to mediate an association. For example, we consider a study that investigates the benefit of interventions in young adulthood for ameliorating the poorer mid-life psychosocial outcomes of adolescent self-harmers relative to their healthy peers. Two methodological challenges arise. First, mediation methods have hitherto mostly focused on the elusive task of discovering pathways, rather than on the evaluation of mediator interventions. Second, the complexity of such questions is invariably such that there are no well-defined mediator interventions (i.e. actual treatments, programs, etc.) for which data exist on the relevant populations, outcomes and time-spans of interest. Instead, researchers must rely on exposure (non-intervention) data, that is, on mediator measures such as depression symptoms for which the actual interventions that one might implement to alter them are not well defined. We propose a novel framework that addresses these challenges by defining mediation effects that map to a target trial of hypothetical interventions targeting multiple mediators for which we simulate the effects. Specifically, we specify a target trial addressing three policy-relevant questions, regarding the impacts of hypothetical interventions that would shift the mediators' distributions (separately under various interdependence assumptions, jointly or sequentially) to user-specified distributions that can be emulated with the observed data. We then define novel interventional effects that map to this trial, simulating shifts by setting mediators to random draws from those distributions. We show that estimation using a g-computation method is possible under an expanded set of causal assumptions relative to inference with well-defined interventions, which reflects the lower level of evidence that is expected with ill-defined interventions. Application to the self-harm example in the Victorian Adolescent Health Cohort Study illustrates the value of our proposal for informing the design and evaluation of actual interventions in the future.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available