4.5 Article

Morphological Evaluation of the Subaxial Cervical Spine in Patients with Basilar Invagination

Journal

SPINE
Volume 46, Issue 20, Pages 1387-1393

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004040

Keywords

anatomy; basilar invagination; computed tomography; the subaxial cervical spine

Funding

  1. The National Natural Science Foundation of China [81702192]
  2. Outstanding Youths Development Scheme of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, China [2017J008]
  3. President Foundation of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, China [2016C021]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study assessed the morphologic features of the subaxial cervical spine in basilar invagination (BI) patients to provide information for accurate screw placement. BI patients have wider pedicle and laminar structures in the subaxial cervical spine, but similar length of pedicle, laminar, and lateral mass compared to the general population.
Basilar invagination is a common deformity in the cervical spine. The screw fixation can be required in situation that basilar invagination is combined with other subaxial cervical spine pathologies. In this study, we assessed the C3-C7 morphologic features of BI patients to instruct the accurate screw placement in this region. Study Design.Retrospective study.Objective.To evaluate the morphologic features of the subaixal cervical spine in patients with basilar invagination (BI) and provide information for the accurate screw placement in this region.Summary of Background Data.BI is a congenital anomaly, comprising a wide range of abnormal structures. The screw fixation can be required in situation that BI is combined with subaxial cervical spine pathologies. However, there are no literatures specifically addressed the subaxial cervical morphology of BI.Method.A total of 42 BI patients were included in this retrospective study. Forty-two patients without head or cervical disease were matched for sexes and ages. Information on radiographic features of the subaxial cervical spine was collected and compared systematically.Results.There were no differences in the age and sex between the BI and control group. The BI group manifested a wider pedicle and laminar than the control group at all cervical levels, except for the pedicle of C6 and C7, and the laminar of C3 and C6. In addition, the BI group had a wider lateral mass from C3 to C5 than the control group. There were no differences in most measurements of the length of pedicle, laminar, and lateral mass.Conclusion.BI patients have a wider pedicle and laminar than the general population in the subaxial cervical spine, but the same size in length of pedicle, laminar, and lateral mass.Level of Evidence: 4Conclusion.BI patients have a wider pedicle and laminar than the general population in the subaxial cervical spine, but the same size in length of pedicle, laminar, and lateral mass.Level of Evidence: 4

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available