4.8 Review

Aligned Carbon-Based Electrodes for Fast-Charging Batteries: A Review

Journal

SMALL
Volume 17, Issue 48, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.202007676

Keywords

aligned structures; carbon materials; electronic conductivity; fast‐ charging batteries; ion transport

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFA0705700]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52072205]
  3. Shenzhen Geim Graphene Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review evaluates the mechanism, advantages, and challenges of aligned carbon-based electrodes (ACBEs) for fast-charging batteries, summarizes the design and preparation methods of ACBEs based on their different dimensions, and illustrates their applications in different batteries.
Fast-charging batteries have attracted great attention, and are anticipated to charge electrical vehicles and consumer electronics to full-capacity in several minutes. However, commercial electrode materials in batteries generally have a limited rate performance and are difficult to be used in fast-charging batteries. Designing electrodes with an aligned structure is an effective way to shorten the ion transport path and improve the rate performance of a battery. The excellent electronic conductivity of carbon-based electrodes is another key factor for increasing the rate capability of rechargeable batteries. Therefore, aligned carbon-based electrodes (ACBEs) can significantly improve the power density by combining the advantages of an aligned structure and carbon-based materials. In this review, the mechanism, advantages, and challenges of ACBEs for fast-charging batteries are evaluated, and then the design and preparation methods of ACBEs based on their different dimensions are summarized, and their applications in different batteries are illustrated. Finally, the future development of ACBEs for fast-charging batteries is considered.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available