4.6 Article

Luminescence Sensing Method for Degradation Analysis of Bioactive Glass Fibers

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s21062054

Keywords

bioactive glass fibers; luminescence; degradation; rare-earth; biomaterials

Funding

  1. National Science Centre (Poland) [DEC-2018/31/N/ST8/02888]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that doping Sm3+ into 13-93 bioactive glass can reduce the degradation rate of glass fibers and accelerate the formation of hydroxycarbonate-apatite layers. Optical analysis and SEM/EDS measurements can effectively monitor the degradation and surface morphology changes of fibers. This research demonstrates that monitoring changes in Sm3+ ion luminescence is a sensitive method for tracking the degradation of bioactive glass fibers.
The effects of Sm3+ content on the optical properties and bioactivity of 13-93 bioactive glass were presented. Sm3+ doped glass fibers drawn from bioactive glass were analyzed in simulated body fluid (SBF) for the determination of ion release. Optical analysis of the Sm3+ ions in bioactive glass fibers was used for degradation monitoring. While the fibers were immersed in SBF solution, changes in their luminescence spectra under 405 nm laser excitation were measured continuously for 48 h. The morphology of the fibers after the immersion process was determined by SEM/EDS. It was shown that the proposed approach to the analysis of changes in Sm3+ ion luminescence is a sensitive method for the monitoring of degradation processes and the formation of hydroxycarbonate-apatite (HCA) layers on glass fiber surfaces. SEM/EDS measurements showed a significant deterioration on the surface of the fibers and the formation of HCA on 13-93_02Sm bioactive glass. The optical analysis of the time constant indicated that bioactive glass fibers doped with 2 %mol Sm3+ degrade at a rate almost five times slower than 13-93_02Sm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available