4.5 Article

Research on Covid-19: a disruptive phenomenon for bibliometrics

Journal

SCIENTOMETRICS
Volume 126, Issue 6, Pages 5305-5319

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-021-03989-w

Keywords

Covid-19; Bibliometrics; Indicator; H-index; Journal impact factor; Disruption; Urgency; Ethics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Covid-19 pandemic has caused a significant disruption worldwide, leading to an explosion of academic research and scientific literature. Research indicates a strong correlation between the impact on bibliometric indicators and the specialization level, highlighting the crucial role of research themes in citations and impact.
The Covid-19 pandemic has been the highest disruptive event in the world recent history. Worldwide academic research on this topic has led to an explosion of scientific literature, never seen before. Bibliometrics provide methods to illustrate this exceptional phenomenon in academic publications. The objective of this paper is to analyze the Covid-19 research from a bibliometric perspective and to study the impact of the publication explosion on bibliometric indicators. The present study shows how an exceptional phenomenon has a disruptive impact on bibliometric indicators, such as the h-index and the Journal Impact Factor. The higher the specialization, the higher the possible impact of a disruptive phenomenon. In applied sciences, more important than the research or the discipline, the specific theme of the research is crucial for citations of articles and for their impact. The salience of the topic, the magnitude of the problem at study and the urgency to find solutions are drivers for citations. The study of the Covid-19 research illustrates the relativity of indicators and the need for context. The present study also confirms the plead for responsible metrics of the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available