4.7 Article

Repurposing of COVID-19 single-use face masks for pavements base/subbase

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 769, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145527

Keywords

COVID-19; Waste management; Face masks; Polypropylene plastic; Recycled concrete aggregate; Pavement geotechnics

Funding

  1. Lowitja Institute, Australia's national institute for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes an innovative way to reduce pandemic-generated waste by recycling used face masks with other waste materials for civil constructions. Experimental results show that blends of shredded face masks and recycled concrete aggregate can meet the requirements for pavements base/subbase applications.
The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has not only created a global health crisis, but it is also now threatening the environment. A multidisciplinary collaborative approach is required to fight against the pandemic and reduce the environmental risks associated with the disposal of used personal protective equipment (PPE). This paper explores an innovative way to reduce pandemic-generated waste by recycling the used face masks with other waste materials in civil constructions. In this research, for the first time, a series of experiments, including modified compaction, unconfined compression strength and resilient modulus tests, were conducted on the blends of different percentages of the shredded face mask (SFM) added to the recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) for road base and subbase applications. The experimental results show that RCA mixed with three different percentages (i.e., 1%, 2% and 3%) of SFM satisfied the stiffness and strength requirements for pavements base/subbase. The introduction of the shredded face mask not only increased the strength and stiffness but also improved the ductility and flexibility of RCA/SFM blends. The inclusion of 1% SFM to RCA resulted in the highest values of unconfined compressive strength (216 kPa) and the highest resilient modulus (314.35 MP). However, beyond 2%, increasing the amount of SFM led to a decrease in strength and stiffness. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available