Journal
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 788, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147881
Keywords
Marine pollution; Adsorption separation; Plastic extraction; Microplastics; Matrix-rich samples; South China Sea
Categories
Funding
- Federal Ministry of Education and Research [03F0786A]
- SO269-SOCLIS BMBF project [FKZ 03G0269]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The study compared different digestion and separation methods for microplastics, finding that an adsorption-based technique was the most gentle and effective isolation method with a high microplastic recovery rate. By analyzing samples from the South China Sea, it was discovered that sediment samples contained 0-9 microplastic items per 10 g dry weight, while water samples had 17-25 items per m3.
Microplastic in the environment hides visible and invisible dangers for the ecosystems and domiciled organisms. Due to the large quantities of microplastics already distributed worldwide, comparative studies to investigate the associated hazards, distribution patterns, and abundances are becoming increasingly important. Due to varying efforts and budgets, there is still no homogenized detection method for microplastics in the environment, which severely compromises the comparability and reliability of results between previous studies. In this study, we compare the efficacy, degradative effect on microplastics, and microplastic recovery rates of different digestion and separation methods for isolating microplastics from mass-limited environmental samples with high biogenic content. Our results show that the most gentle and effective isolation method is an adsorption-based technique that exploits the lipophilic properties of plastic for separation. This technique achieves an average microplastic recovery rate of 98.0 +/- 3.8% and a matrix removal of 963 +/- 0.3% at low cost and minimum effort. To examine the applicability of this technique to natural environmental samples, eight sediments and two plankton net samples from the South China Sea were selected to determine miaoplastic abundances. In the analyzed sediment samples, 0-9 microplastic items per 10 g sediment d. w. were found, while 17-25 items per m 3 were detected in net samples. Considering the respective mean plastic density, this corresponds to a calculated microplastic mass of 0-39 mu g (10g d.w.)(-l) and 3.7-7.1 mu g m(-3) in sediment and water samples, respectively. This study represents a new way of microplastic extraction from matrix-rich mass-limited samples with high accuracy and easy feasibility at low costs, which would be useful as a worldwide homogenized method in future microplastic research projects and related data comparability. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available