4.7 Article

In-situ nanoscale insights into the evolution of solid electrolyte interphase shells: revealing interfacial degradation in lithium metal batteries

Journal

SCIENCE CHINA-CHEMISTRY
Volume 64, Issue 5, Pages 734-738

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11426-020-9984-9

Keywords

solid electrolyte interphase shell; lithium deposition and stripping; interfacial degradation; lithium metal battery

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFA0202500]
  2. National Nature Science Fund for Excellent Young Scholars [21722508]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The SEI shell formation and evolution during lithium deposition/stripping impacts the performance of lithium metal batteries, with collapsed SEI shells leading to capacity degradation. Unveiling these processes at the nanoscale allows for a better understanding and improvement strategies for lithium metal anodes.
The solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) has caught considerable attention as a pivotal factor affecting lithium (Li) metal battery performances. However, the understanding of the interfacial evolution and properties of the on-site formed SEI shells on Li deposits during cycling is still at a preliminary stage. Here, we provide a straightforward visualized evidence of SEI shells' evolution during Li deposition/stripping to reveal anode degradation via in-situ atomic force microscopy (AFM). Nucleation and growth of quasi-spherical Li particles are observed on a Cu substrate, followed by Li stripping and collapse of SEI shells. In the subsequent cycling, new Li deposits tend to nucleate at pristine sites with fresh SEI shells forming on Li. The previously collapsed SEI shells accumulate to increase interface impedance, eventually leading to capacity degradation. Revealing the electrochemical processes and interfacial degradation at the nanoscale will enrich fundamental comprehension and further guide improvement strategies of Li metal anodes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available