4.2 Article

Combining information across diverse sources: The II-CC-FF paradigm

Journal

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF STATISTICS
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages 625-656

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/sjos.12530

Keywords

combining information; confidence distributions; confidence likelihoods; focused fusion; hard and soft data; meta‐ analysis

Funding

  1. Norges Forskningsrad [235116]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The proposed method introduces a general paradigm for combining information from diverse data sources through three steps: independent inspection, confidence conversion, and focused fusion. This method, equivalent to versions of meta-analysis in traditional setups, demonstrates competitiveness when applied to more difficult problems.
We introduce and develop a general paradigm for combining information across diverse data sources. In broad terms, suppose phi is a parameter of interest, built up via components psi 1, horizontal ellipsis ,psi k from data sources 1, horizontal ellipsis , k. The proposed scheme has three steps. First, the independent inspection (II) step amounts to investigating each separate data source, translating statistical information to a confidence distribution (CD) Cj(psi j) for the relevant focus parameter psi j associated with data source j. Second, confidence conversion (CC) techniques are used to translate the CDs to confidence log-likelihood functions. Finally, the focused fusion (FF) step uses relevant and context-driven techniques to construct a confidence distribution for the primary focus parameter phi=phi(psi 1, horizontal ellipsis ,psi k), acting on the combined confidence log-likelihood. In traditional setups, the II-CC-FF strategy amounts to versions of meta-analysis, and turns out to be competitive against state-of-the-art methods. Its potential lies in applications to harder problems, however. Illustrations are presented, related to actual applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available