3.9 Article

Structure and Dynamics of Coarse Woody Debris Stocks in Middle-Taiga Bilberry Pine Forests

Journal

RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY
Volume 52, Issue 2, Pages 136-145

Publisher

PLEIADES PUBLISHING INC
DOI: 10.1134/S1067413621020089

Keywords

forest ecosystems; coarse woody debris; stock; decay; age-related dynamics; standing deadwood; downed deadwood; carbon balance

Categories

Funding

  1. State Assignment of the Forest Research Institute of Karelian Research Center, Russian Academy of Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study revealed that the amount of coarse woody debris (CWD) decreases with stand age in bilberry pine forests in the southern part of the Republic of Karelia, while the stocks of wood detritus increase. Additionally, there are differences in CWD stocks in terms of components and decay level among different age groups.
Thepurpose of this study was to ascertain the stocks of coarse woody debris (CWD) in bilberry pine forests in the southern part of the Republic of Karelia (the middle taiga subzone) and evaluate age-related changes in CWD abundance, stocks, and structure and reveal patterns in their dynamics. Analysis of data from 160 sample plots has shown that the amount of CWD decreases with age: on average, from 1525 (SE +/- 12) pcs/ha in young stands to 805 (SE +/- 13) pcs/ha in premature ones and 507 (SE +/- 7) pcs/ha in overmature stands. On the contrary, the stocks of wood detritus increase from 21 (SE +/- 2.6) m(3)/ha in young stands to 32 (SE +/- 2.9) m(3)/ha in premature stands and 69 (SE +/- 6.8) m(3)/ha in overmature stands. CWD stocks differ in the composition of components: with respect to the number of trunks, standing deadwood prevails in young and middle-aged stands, with the proportion of downed deadwood gradually increasing over time; with respect to the stock, downed deadwood prevails in all age groups except middle-aged stands. The degree of CWD decay gradually increases with stand aging.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available