4.7 Article

Cyclic Water Injection Potentially Mitigates Seismic Risks by Promoting Slow and Stable Slip of a Natural Fracture in Granite

Journal

ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING
Volume 54, Issue 10, Pages 5389-5405

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-021-02438-7

Keywords

Natural fracture activation; Induced seismicity; Monotonic injection; Cyclic injection; Critical stress state; Fracture slip mode

Funding

  1. International Collaborative Research Program - Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology (KICT) [20180583-001, 20190282-001, 20200209-001]
  2. Korea-China (NRF-NSFC) Joint Research Cooperation Program [2018K2A9A2A06021342]
  3. European Commission Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [691728]
  4. Helmholtz Association's Initiative and Networking Fund for the Helmholtz Young Investigator Group ARES [VH-NG-1516]
  5. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [691728] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigates the activation of a critically stressed natural fracture in granite under pressure-controlled and volume-controlled monotonic and cyclic water injection. Results show that cyclic injection can lead to aseismic fracture slip at smaller peak slip rates compared to monotonic injection, but continued injection after an unstable shut-in stage could result in rapid and unstable fracture slip.
Induced seismicity associated with fluid injection has raised serious concerns for the safety and efficiency of geo-energy systems. Cyclic injection has recently been proposed as an alternative injection scheme to reduce the large magnitude injection-induced seismicity. However, the influence of cyclic injection on the activation of natural fractures in granite and the resulting seismic risk is not yet clear. This study investigates the injection-induced activation of a critically stressed natural fracture in a granite core sample, particularly focusing on the comparison between monotonic and cyclic water injection under pressure-controlled and volume-controlled conditions. Experimental results show that the acceleration and deceleration of fracture slip are modulated by the shear stress imbalance between the fixed shear stress and the evolving frictional strength of the fracture. Fracture slip affects the fluid pressure distribution on the fracture, which in turn regulates the frictional strength of the fracture. At a small total shear displacement (i.e., 0 9 mm in this study), cyclic injection with a restricted peak injection pressure results in aseismic fracture slip at much smaller peak slip rates compared to that during the monotonic injection. On the one hand, the more uniform reduction in effective normal stress caused by cyclic injection encourages slow and stable fracture slip, characterized by the smaller peak slip rates. On the other hand, the flowback of injected fluid or suspension of injection could prevent the occurrence of fast-accelerated fracture slip during cyclic injection. However, the fracture can become unstable when it has experienced a considerable amount of total shear displacement (larger than 0.9 mm in this study), and likely gained a significantly enhanced permeability. Continued injection after the unstable shut-in stage, signified by an unusual increase in slip rate and an accelerated drop in injection pressure, could result in rapid and unstable fracture slip.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available