4.5 Article

Global identification of RsmA/N binding sites in Pseudomonas aeruginosa by in vivo UV CLIP-seq

Journal

RNA BIOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue 12, Pages 2401-2416

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15476286.2021.1917184

Keywords

Pseudomonas aeruginosa; RsmA; RsmN; CLIP-seq; post-transcriptional regulation

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [16H06279]
  2. [17J10663]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study detected over 500 binding sites of RsmA/N in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and verified a consensus motif for their binding. Genetic analysis combined with CLIP-seq results suggested previously unrecognized targets of RsmA/N involved in LPS modification, and proposed a possible mechanism for RsmA/N-mediated regulation of RsmY/RsmZ.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa harbours two redundant RNA-binding proteins RsmA/RsmN (RsmA/N), which play a critical role in balancing acute and chronic infections. However, in vivo binding sites on target transcripts and the overall impact on the physiology remains unclear. In this study, we applied in vivo UV crosslinking immunoprecipitation followed by RNA-sequencing (UV CLIP-seq) to detect RsmA/N-binding sites at single-nucleotide resolution and mapped more than 500 binding sites to approximately 400 genes directly bound by RsmA/N in P. aeruginosa. This also verified the ANGGA sequence in apical loops skewed towards 5'UTRs as a consensus motif for RsmA/N binding. Genetic analysis combined with CLIP-seq results suggested previously unrecognized RsmA/N targets involved in LPS modification. Moreover, the RsmA/N-titrating RNAs RsmY/RsmZ may be positively regulated by the RsmA/N-mediated translational repression of their upstream regulators, thus providing a possible mechanistic explanation for homoeostasis of the Rsm system. Thus, our study provides a detailed view of RsmA/N-RNA interactions and a resource for further investigation of the pleiotropic effects of RsmA/N on gene expression in P. aeruginosa.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available