Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
Olivier Jolliet et al.
Summary: The study highlights the potential risks associated with household products in daily life and emphasizes the importance of assessing exposure and toxicity data comprehensively. Significant variability exists in the risks among chemical-product combinations, and prioritization based solely on hazard is insufficient for evaluating actual risk levels.
Article
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
Adam M. Finkel et al.
Summary: This article discusses four challenging issues in risk-based decision making, including the role of potential thresholds in dose-response functions, the lack of health reference values for many chemicals distorting risk management, model uncertainty as a challenge for risk characterization, and the untapped potential of value-of-information analysis in enhancing public health decision making. Further research is needed on these issues, but some solutions may already exist in the ideas proposed by John.
Article
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
Katherine von Stackelberg et al.
Summary: Historically, managing public health risks from environmental contaminants has relied on a risk assessment process defined by the regulatory context in which these risks are assessed. The risk assessment guidance follows a straightforward chemical-by-chemical approach to inform regulatory decisions. However, there are scientific versus regulatory tensions in applying innovative risk assessment approaches for future assessments, and challenges in translating improved scientific understanding to the regulatory landscape for better decision making beyond conventional mandates.
Article
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
Jonathan J. Buonocore et al.
Summary: The study estimates that the benefits associated with avoiding exposure to ambient ozone and fine particles when air quality thresholds are exceeded is generally less than $14 per person for one additional hour spent indoors. However, these estimates are sensitive to assumptions regarding the relationship between decreased exposure and mortality risks. Individuals' decisions to stay indoors likely depend on the value of health benefits compared with the value of forgone work and leisure activities. The national warning system provides flexibility for individuals to tailor their responses to personal circumstances, but the benefits under typical conditions are small.
Article
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
John S. Evans et al.
Summary: Retrofitting diesel vehicles in Mexico City with particulate filters and oxidation catalysts can significantly reduce emissions and improve public health, resulting in both economic and health benefits that outweigh the initial costs. This study highlights the importance of considering various interventions to control air pollution and protect public health, and emphasizes the need for further analysis and implementation of these measures.
Article
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
Christoph M. Rheinberger
Summary: This article presents a unified framework for cancer risk management that utilizes probabilistic methods to assess variability in individual exposure and cancer susceptibility, as well as to evaluate excess cancer risk and welfare benefits. The study findings show that limiting hexavalent chromium exposure in France can reduce the risk of lung cancer for workers, leading to significant welfare gains at the cohort level.
Article
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
Jonathan I. Levy
Summary: There is a growing interest in accounting for inequality in health risks and benefits within regulatory impact analyses, yet limited progress has been made in practice despite the increasing literature on this topic. Controversy remains regarding the best approaches to formally incorporate inequality and whether it makes sense to quantify inequality in this context.
Editorial Material
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
Michael Greenberg et al.
Article
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
Patrick L. Kinney
Summary: Professor Evans' early study on cross-sectional mortality studies in air pollution risk assessment provides a comprehensive primer on assessing long-term mortality risks from airborne particles. The paper challenges previous criticisms and suggests a causal relationship between exposure to airborne particles and premature mortality. Acknowledging the difficulty in quantifying the long-term mortality effect of particle air pollution, further research utilizing alternative approaches is needed.
Review
Environmental Sciences
C. Arden Pope et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
(2020)
Article
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
James K. Hammitt et al.
Article
Environmental Sciences
Elisabeth A. Gilmore et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
(2019)
Article
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
Eileen Abt et al.
