4.5 Review

Intravenous prostacyclin-analogue therapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension - A review of the past, present and future

Journal

RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
Volume 179, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106336

Keywords

Prostacyclin; Epoprostenol; Iloprost; Treprostinil; Pulmonary arterial hypertension; Implantable drug pump

Funding

  1. University Medicine Greifswald

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intravenous prostacyclin analogues therapy for PAH patients has a long history and is now a crucial part of current guidelines. The development of fully implantable pump systems has improved convenience and reduced infection rates.
Therapy with intravenous prostacyclin analogues in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) has been established for decades and is an integral component of the current guidelines for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Initially, these drugs were infused by external pump systems via tunnelled right atrial catheters with the need for cooling and frequent exchange of drug reservoirs. Associated complications included, among others, catheter-related infections. More recently, fully implantable pump systems have been developed with drug reservoirs that are filled transcutaneously, allowing intervals between refills of several weeks. This technique results in a low rate of infections. Epoprostenol, iloprost and treprostinil have all been used intravenously in PAH, but titration, dosing and dose escalation in long-term therapy are not standardized. Intravenous prostacyclin analogues are still under-used, despite available data suggesting that early and broad application of these therapies as part of risk-oriented, guideline-directed combination therapy for patients with PAH may lead to a survival benefit. This review provides a detailed overview of the drugs, infusion systems and dosing strategies used for intravenous therapy in patients with PAH.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available