4.2 Article

In Vitro Comparison of Different Nebulizers Delivering 7% Hypertonic Saline

Journal

RESPIRATORY CARE
Volume 66, Issue 10, Pages 1582-1587

Publisher

DAEDALUS ENTERPRISES INC
DOI: 10.4187/respcare.08834

Keywords

breath-actuated jet nebulizer; breath-enhanced jet nebulizer; continuous output jet nebulizer; hypertonic saline; aerosol characteristics; cystic fibrosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study compared the aerosol characteristics of hypertonic saline delivered by nebulizers of different operating principles, finding that aerosols generated by the breath-enhanced and breath-actuated nebulizers were similar, while those generated by the continuous-output nebulizer were different. Airway delivery values were similar between the two breath-enhanced nebulizers and higher than those observed with the breath-actuated and continuous-output nebulizers.
BACKGROUND: Nebulized 7% hypertonic saline is used to treat patients with cystic fibrosis. Clinical trials supporting its use were conducted with breath-enhanced nebulizers (BEN). It is not uncommon for the specific nebulizer used in studies or prescribed by a physician to be unavailable to patients. The investigator compared the aerosol characteristics of hypertonic saline delivered by nebulizers of different operating principles. METHODS: A continuous-output nebulizer (CON), a breath-actuated (BAN) jet nebulizer, and 2 brands of BEN (Pari LC Plus and Sidestream Plus) were tested. Airway delivery and aerosol characteristics of nebulizers loaded with 7% hypertonic saline were determined with 3 breathing simulations (ie, infant, child, and adult breathing patterns) and cascade impaction, respectively. Solutes were analyzed with freezing point osmometry. RESULTS: Aerosols generated with the BEN and BAN had similar mass median aerodynamic diameters (3.43-3.67 mu m), geometric standard deviations (2.12-2.34), percentage of particles < 5 mu m (63.1-68.9%), and percentage of particles 1-3 mu m (35.9-37%). The CON produced a larger aerosol than BEN and BAN. The 2 BENs had similar airway delivery values that were greater than those for both CON and BAN. CONCLUSIONS: Hypertonic saline aerosols generated with the BEN and BAN devices were similar, while that generated with the CON was different. Airway delivery was similar between the BEN devices, but higher than that observed with the BAN and CON devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available