4.7 Article

The contingency effects of internal and external collaboration on the performance effects of green practices

Journal

RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING
Volume 167, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105383

Keywords

Green practices; Green supply chain collaboration; Stakeholder collaboration; Environmental management; Contingency

Funding

  1. Thammasat Business School

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study suggests that the performance effects of different green practices depend on the types of internal and external collaboration. Green product design and packaging practices are more effective with high levels of collaboration, while green production, sourcing, and logistics practices are more effective with low levels of collaboration. It is crucial to consider the types of collaboration when implementing green practices.
Past studies separately show internal/external collaboration and different green practices can create different performance outcomes. By extending these studies, this paper hypothesizes that the performance effects of different green practices (that emphasize operations and product/market innovation) depend on the types of internal and external collaboration. The hypotheses are tested through a survey of manufacturers in China (Hong Kong) and the United Kingdom. As expected, green product design and packaging practices (emphasize innovation) create environmental and cost benefits when there are high levels of internal and external collaboration. Instead, green production, sourcing, and logistics practices (emphasize operations) create performance when the levels of internal and external collaboration are low. Only green production creates financial/market performance at a high level of stakeholder collaboration. These results show that it is important to distinguish the types of collaboration when implementing various green practices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available