4.7 Article

Experimental investigation of dust accumulation effect on the performance of tubular daylight guidance systems

Journal

RENEWABLE ENERGY
Volume 169, Issue -, Pages 726-737

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.01.061

Keywords

Daylighting; Tubular device; Dust; Soiling; Cleaning

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tubular daylight guidance systems in desert climate regions are prone to dust accumulation, which significantly reduces efficiency and should be cleaned bimonthly to restore performance. Dust accumulation decreases efficiency near-linearly, with the highest illuminance observed at midday.
Tubular daylight guidance systems were developed to introduce daylight into the building's core. Operating the system in desert climate regions, where both solar irradiance and dust resources are abundant, exposes them to dust accumulation that significantly reduces the system's efficiency. An experimental investigation was conducted in Cairo to understanding dirt accumulation patterns and impact, and to recommend suitable cleaning procedures. It was found that dust accumulation during three rainless periods, of 44 days each, could reduce the illuminance transmittance by up to 38%. The dust accumulation was found to decrease the system efficiency in a near-linear fashion with a 0.5% daily reduction. The highest illuminance transmittance magnitude and ratio were observed at midday, followed by the morning period and then the afternoon period. Similarly, the transmittance loss by the end of the experiment was found to be around 31%, 26% and 13% at noon, morning and afternoon respectively. It was found that the transmittance loss under a clear sky is up to 25% more than that under a cloudy sky. Further work needs to be done to examine other meteorological factors. Based on the study findings, it is recommended to clean the solar devices bimonthly to restore the system's efficiency. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available