4.8 Review

A review of geometry optimisation of wave energy converters

Journal

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
Volume 139, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110593

Keywords

Optimisation problem; Hull geometry; Wave energy converter; Device design; Cost of energy

Funding

  1. Energy Technology Partnership
  2. UKCMER (EPSRC) [EP/I027912/1, EP/P008682/1]
  3. EPSRC [EP/P008682/1, EP/I027912/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reducing the energy cost of wave energy converters is crucial for technological advancement, with optimization of device structure showing the greatest potential for cost reduction. Various studies have been conducted over the last 20 years to find improved hull shapes that maximize power generation and minimize costs.
Reducing the cost of energy of wave energy converters is key for the advancement of the technology. The costs associated with the device structure show the highest potential to achieve this reduction. For this reason, many hull geometry optimisation studies have been performed over the last 20 years, with the aim of finding improved hull shapes, that maximise the power generation and minimise the costs. These studies have been performed for different types of devices, applying a number of optimisation algorithms and representing power generation and costs with various strategies. The definition of the optimisation problem and the use of the most suitable strategies is key for a successful optimisation process, which will provide meaningful results and support device design at early development stages. This paper reviews all these different approaches, with a view to distilling the main findings and best practices; it then formulates recommendations based on these. The work is intended to serve as reference for any technology developer wishing to perform wave energy converter optimisation and for any funding body wanting to assess different device designs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available