4.8 Article

Ecological impacts of run -of -river hydropower plants ? Current status and future prospects on the brink of energy transition

Journal

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
Volume 142, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.110833

Keywords

Energy policy; Environmental impacts; Hydropower policy; Mitigation measures; Renewable energy; Sustainable development

Funding

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia, I.P. (FCT), Portugal
  2. Ph.D. Program FLUVIO-River Restoration and Management [PD/BD/114558/2016]
  3. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion, Spain [PID2019111252RA-I00 CTA, PID2019-105852RA-I00]
  4. Universidad Politecnica de Madrid (Programa Propio: Ayudas a Proyectos de I+D de Investigadores Posdoctorales)
  5. Comunidad de Madrid (Convenio Plurianual con la Universidad Politecnica de Madrid) [APOYO-JOVENES-PHZKKU-148-SSPVMP]
  6. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PD/BD/114558/2016] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The widespread perception of small run-of-river hydropower plants as renewable energy sources has led to their global proliferation, but such schemes may have negative impacts on fluvial ecosystems. Different types of small run-of-river hydropower schemes have varying ecological impacts, with diversion weir and pondage schemes being less eco-friendly compared to dam-toe schemes. Environmental flows are crucial for ecosystem conservation in rivers affected by hydropower operations.
The general perception of small run-of-river hydropower plants as renewable energy sources with little or no environmental impacts has led to a global proliferation of this hydropower technology. However, such hydro-power schemes may alter the natural flow regime and impair the fluvial ecosystem at different trophic levels. This paper presents a global-scale analysis of the major ecological impacts of three main small run-of-river hydropower types: dam-toe, diversion weir, and pondage schemes. This review?s main objective is to provide an extensive overview of how changing the natural flow regime due to hydropower operation may affect various aspects of the fluvial ecosystem. Ultimately, it will inform decision-makers in water resources and ecosystem conservation for better planning and management. This review analyses data on ecological impacts from 33 countries in five regions, considering the last forty years? most relevant publications, a total of 146 peer-reviewed publications. The analysis was focused on impacts in biota, water quality, hydrologic alteration, and geo-morphology. The results show, notably, the diversion weir and the pondage hydropower schemes are less eco-friendly; the opposite was concluded for the dam-toe hydropower scheme. Although there was conflicting in-formation from different countries and sources, the most common impacts are: water depletion downstream of the diversion, water quality deterioration, loss of longitudinal connectivity, habitat degradation, and simplifi-cation of the biota community composition. A set of potential non-structural and structural mitigation measures was recommended to mitigate several ecological impacts such as connectivity loss, fish injuries, and aquatic habitat degradation. Among mitigation measures, environmental flows are fundamental for fluvial ecosystem conservation. The main research gaps and some of the pressing future research needs were highlighted, as well. Finally, interdisciplinary research progress involving different stakeholders is crucial to harmonize conflicting interests and enable the sustainable development of small run-of-river hydropower plants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available