Journal
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
Volume 160, Issue -, Pages 175-184Publisher
ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.04.019
Keywords
Automatic segmentation; Organs at risk; Deep learning
Funding
- Clinical Research Innovation Plan of Shanghai General Hospital [CTCCR-2019D06]
- Shanghai Municipal Education CommissionGaofeng Clinical Medicine Grant Support [20181713]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study introduced a deep learning-based automatic segmentation algorithm, WBNet, which accurately and efficiently delineates major organs at risk (OARs) on CT images. WBNet outperformed other AS algorithms in terms of DSC values and delineation time, showing great effectiveness in clinical practice.
Background and purpose: Delineating organs at risk (OARs) on computed tomography (CT) images is an essential step in radiation therapy; however, it is notoriously time-consuming and prone to interobserver variation. Herein, we report a deep learning-based automatic segmentation (AS) algorithm (WBNet) that can accurately and efficiently delineate all major OARs in the entire body directly on CT scans. Materials and methods: We collected 755 CT scans of the head and neck, thorax, abdomen, and pelvis and manually delineated 50 OARs on the CT images. The CT images with contours were split into training and test sets consisting of 505 and 250 cases, respectively, to develop and validate WBNet. The volumetric Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95th-percentile Hausdorff distance (95% HD) were calculated to evaluate delineation quality for each OAR. We compared the performance of WBNet with three AS algorithms: one commercial multi-atlas-based automatic segmentation (ABAS) software, and two deep learning-based AS algorithms, namely, AnatomyNet and nnU-Net. We have also evaluated the time saving and dose accuracy of WBNet. Results: WBNet achieved average DSCs of 0.84 and 0.81 on in-house and public datasets, respectively, which outperformed ABAS, AnatomyNet, and nnU-Net. WBNet could reduce the delineation time significantly and perform well in treatment planning, with clinically acceptable dose differences compared with those in manual delineation. Conclusion: This study shows the feasibility and benefits of using WBNet in clinical practice. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. Radiotherapy and Oncology 160 (2021) 175-184 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available