4.7 Article

68Ga-fibroblast activation protein inhibitor PET/CT on gross tumour volume delineation for radiotherapy planning of oesophageal cancer

Journal

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
Volume 158, Issue -, Pages 55-61

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.02.015

Keywords

Ga-68-FAPI; F-18-FDG; PET/CT; Oesophageal cancer; Gross target volume

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81772893, 82071961]
  2. Key Medical and Health Projects in Xiamen [3502Z20191104, 3502Z20209002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared Ga-68-FAPI and F-18-FDG PET/CT in imaging locally advanced esophageal cancer and evaluated the potential usefulness of Ga-68-FAPI PET/CT in radiotherapy planning. Ga-68-FAPI PET showed significantly higher radiotracer uptake in primary tumors compared to F-18-FDG PET, suggesting its advantage in target volume delineation.
Background and purpose: To compare Ga-68-fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) and F-18-FDG PET/ CT in imaging locally advanced oesophageal cancer, and evaluate the potential usefulness of Ga-68-FAPI PET/CT on gross target volume (GTV) delineation aimed at radiotherapy planning for oesophageal cancer as compared with contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT) and F-18-FDG PET/CT. Materials and methods: Twenty-one patients with newly diagnosed oesophageal cancer who underwent both F-18-FDG and Ga-68-FAPI PET/CT scans were selected. GTVs of the primary tumours based on CE-CT (GTV(CT)), PET/CT, and CE-CT plus PET/CT were delineated. Gross tumour lengths were measured by GTVs and endoscopy and recorded. Results: The Ga-68-FAPI PET showed significantly higher radiotracer uptake than F-18-FDG PET (median SUVmax 16.71 vs. 11.23; P = 0.002) in the primary tumours. SUV thresholds of FAPI x20%, 30%, 40%, and FDG x40% showed similar lesion lengths compared with that in endoscopic examination (P > 0.05). GTV(CT) demonstrated the largest volume (median: 48.80 mm(3), range: 14.83-162.23 mm(3)) than PET-based GTVs. For PET/CT-guided complementary contouring of GTV(CT), four patients (19%) were increased by FAPI x20% and 30%, two patients (9.5%) were increased by FAPI x40%, and only one patient was increased by FDG x40%. Furthermore, the volume of GTV based on CE-CT plus FAPI x20%, 30%, and 40% showed no significant difference with GTV(CT) and planning target volume based CE-CT plus FAPI-PET and meets the organ at risk standard. Conclusion: The Ga-68-FAPI PET/CT methodology showed favourable tumour-to-background contrast in oesophageal cancer and might provide additional information for target volume delineation and help avoid tumour geographic misses. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available