4.5 Article

Biologically consistent dose accumulation using daily patient imaging

Journal

RADIATION ONCOLOGY
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01789-3

Keywords

Dose accumulation; Linear quadratic model; Image guidance; Delivered dose; Normal tissue response; Radiobiology

Funding

  1. Projekt DEAL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study addresses an inconsistency in dose accumulation in radiotherapy based on the linear quadratic model. By introducing the concept of total biological dose (bEQD(d), the study demonstrates that bEQD(d) can overcome potential systematic inaccuracies in biological effect prediction based on accumulated dose.
Background This work addresses a basic inconsistency in the way dose is accumulated in radiotherapy when predicting the biological effect based on the linear quadratic model (LQM). To overcome this inconsistency, we introduce and evaluate the concept of the total biological dose, bEQD(d). Methods Daily computed tomography imaging of nine patients treated for prostate carcinoma with intensity-modulated radiotherapy was used to compute the delivered deformed dose on the basis of deformable image registration (DIR). We compared conventional dose accumulation (DA) with the newly introduced bEQD(d), a new method of accumulating biological dose that considers each fraction dose and tissue radiobiology. We investigated the impact of the applied fractionation scheme (conventional/hypofractionated), uncertainties induced by the DIR and by the assigned alpha/beta-value. Results bEQD(d) was systematically higher than the conventionally accumulated dose with difference hot spots of 3.3-4.9 Gy detected in six out of nine patients in regions of high dose gradient in the bladder and rectum. For hypofractionation, differences are up to 8.4 Gy. The difference amplitude was found to be in a similar range to worst-case uncertainties induced by DIR and was higher than that induced by alpha/beta. Conclusion Using bEQD(d) for dose accumulation overcomes a potential systematic inaccuracy in biological effect prediction based on accumulated dose. Highest impact is found for serial-type late responding organs at risk in dose gradient regions and for hypofractionation. Although hot spot differences are in the order of several Gray, in dose-volume parameters there is little difference compared with using conventional or biological DA. However, when local dose information is used, e.g. dose surface maps, difference hot spots can potentially change outcomes of dose-response modelling and adaptive treatment strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available