4.2 Article

The influence of sad mood induction on task performance and metacognition

Journal

QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 74, Issue 9, Pages 1605-1614

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/17470218211004205

Keywords

Negative mood; metacognition; confidence; sadness; depression

Funding

  1. Mini-Arc grant from the Universite Libre de Bruxelles [A.R. 5/7/96-M]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metacognition plays a crucial role in decision-making and behavior adaptation, with a strong relationship found between metacognition and emotional disorders like depression. This study confirms a causal relationship between negative affect and metacognitive abilities, showing that inducing a negative mood can lower individuals' confidence levels in their performance.
In many situations, the ability to make appropriate metacognitive judgements on our performance is essential to make decisions and adapt our behaviour. Past research suggests a strong relationship between metacognition and emotional disorders such as depression. Depressive disorders have been associated with an underestimation bias: depressive patients report lower confidence in their performance than healthy individuals. It is currently not clear whether the induction of a negative mood in healthy participants has similar consequences. Yet, such knowledge would permit to isolate the causal influence of the negative affect on metacognition, free of all the comorbidities associated with depression. In this study, we used a combination of films, pictures, and recalls to induce negative and neutral moods during a perceptual metacognitive task. Negative mood induction had no impact on the perceptual task. Participants did report lower confidence levels in the negative condition compared with a neutral condition. This study thus confirms a causal relationship between negative affect and metacognitive abilities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available