Journal
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW
Volume 128, Issue 4, Pages 757-765Publisher
AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/rev0000278
Keywords
Weber; Fechner; Weber principle
Categories
Funding
- Israel Science Foundation [ISF-543-19]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The term Weber-Fechner law is commonly misused in psychological science. The two laws, Weber's law and Fechner's law, are actually independent of each other. It is important to draw a distinction between them to avoid confusion and misapplication.
The term Weber-Fechner law is arguably the most widely used misnomer in psychological science. The unification reflects a failure to appreciate the logical independence and disparate implications of Weber's law and Fechner's law as well as some closely aligned ones. The present statement, long overdue, is meant to rectify this situation. I discuss the roots and derivations of the relevant laws, eschewing formalism to bare essentials for sake of wider accessibility. Three of the most important conclusions are (a) Weber's law is not indispensable for deriving Fechner's law; (b) arguably, Fechner himself did not use Weber's law in his original derivations; and (c) many investigators mistake the principle that subjective distance is determined by physical ratio for Weber's law. In truth, the principle, here called the Weber principle, and Weber's law, are different and independent. I stress the importance of drawing the distinction and illustrate confusions in the literature coming from misapplications of Weber's law and the use of misnomer.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available