4.7 Article

Effects of dietary interventions on depressive symptom profiles: results from the MooDFOOD depression prevention study

Journal

PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE
Volume 52, Issue 15, Pages 3580-3589

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0033291721000337

Keywords

Diet; depression prevention; depressive symptom profiles; heterogeneity

Funding

  1. ZonMw: The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development, research program GGZ [636310017]
  2. European Union FP7 [613598]
  3. UK by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), through the Primary Care Research Network
  4. NIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that food-related behavioral interventions are most beneficial in alleviating somatic symptoms and symptoms of atypical, energy-related profiles linked to an immuno-metabolic form of depression. Multi-nutrient supplements are not suggested to reduce depressive symptoms.
Background Dietary interventions did not prevent depression onset nor reduced depressive symptoms in a large multi-center randomized controlled depression prevention study (MooDFOOD) involving overweight adults with subsyndromal depressive symptoms. We conducted follow-up analyses to investigate whether dietary interventions differ in their effects on depressive symptom profiles (mood/cognition; somatic; atypical, energy-related). Methods Baseline, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up data from MooDFOOD were used (n = 933). Participants received (1) placebo supplements, (2) food-related behavioral activation (F-BA) therapy with placebo supplements, (3) multi-nutrient supplements (omega-3 fatty acids and a multi-vitamin), or (4) F-BA therapy with multi-nutrient supplements. Depressive symptom profiles were based on the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology. Results F-BA therapy was significantly associated with decreased severity of the somatic (B = -0.03, p = 0.014, d = -0.10) and energy-related (B = -0.08, p = 0.001, d = -0.13), but not with the mood/cognition symptom profile, whereas multi-nutrient supplementation was significantly associated with increased severity of the mood/cognition (B = 0.05, p = 0.022, d = 0.09) and the energy-related (B = 0.07, p = 0.002, d = 0.12) but not with the somatic symptom profile. Conclusions Differentiating depressive symptom profiles indicated that food-related behavioral interventions are most beneficial to alleviate somatic symptoms and symptoms of the atypical, energy-related profile linked to an immuno-metabolic form of depression, although effect sizes were small. Multi-nutrient supplements are not indicated to reduce depressive symptom profiles. These findings show that attention to clinical heterogeneity in depression is of importance when studying dietary interventions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available