4.7 Article

Visual memory improvement in adolescents at high risk for suicide who are receiving psychotherapy at a community clinic

Journal

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
Volume 298, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.113796

Keywords

Cognitive assessment; High-risk suicide adolescents; Psychotherapy

Categories

Funding

  1. Fundacion Alicia Koplowitz

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated cognitive differences between adolescents at risk for suicide and healthy controls, and found that after psychotherapy, high-risk adolescents performed as well as healthy controls in all cognitive domains. Those who responded to psychotherapy showed better performance in visual memory.
The current study aims to: 1) investigate cognitive differences among adolescents at risk for suicide versus healthy controls (HC) and 2) identify cognitive changes associated with response to psychotherapy among adolescents at high risk for suicide. Thirty-five adolescents at high risk for suicide (HR), and 14 HC adolescents were recruited. Clinical and cognitive assessments were conducted in both groups at baseline and 16 weeks later (after the patients completed psychotherapy). HR and HC adolescents were compared at baseline and at completion of the study. We also conducted further analysis by separating into two groups the HR adolescents who responded to psychotherapy (n=17) and those who did not (n=11). At baseline, the HR group had significantly lower performance on verbal memory and processing speed than the HC group. At week 16, HR adolescents performed as well as HC adolescents in all cognitive domains. Among patients, better performance on visual memory was observed in those who responded to psychotherapy compared to those who did not. We concluded that lower performance on verbal memory and processing speed may be associated with a high risk for suicide among adolescents. Improvement in visual memory might be related to a lower risk for suicide in adolescents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available