4.5 Article

Extracellular vesicles in the transfusion medicine field: The potential of proteomics

Journal

PROTEOMICS
Volume 21, Issue 13-14, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.202000089

Keywords

extracellular vesicles; proteomics; transfusion medicine

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [PID2019-108727RB-I00]
  2. Conselleria de Cultura, Educacion e Ordenacion Universitaria, Xunta deGalicia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

EVs released during blood component storage are still debated for their clinical impact in transfusions, but proteomics offers a valuable tool to study their cargo. Analyzing EVs with high coverage proteomic tools could provide insights into storage lesions and potential transfusion adverse reactions.
In transfusion centres, blood components are divided and stored following specific guidelines. The storage temperature and time vary among the blood cells but all of them release extracellular vesicles (EVs) under blood bank conditions. The clinical impact of such vesicles in blood components for transfusion is an object of debate, but should be considered and is being investigated. In this context, proteomics is an excellent tool to study the cargo and composition of EVs derived from red blood cells and platelets, since such vesicles are enriched in lipids and proteins. The development of quantitative mass spectrometry techniques and the evolution of bioinformatics have allowed the identification of novel EVs biomarkers for different diseases. In this context, the application of high coverage proteomic tools to the analysis of EVs in the transfusion medicine field would provide information about storage lesions and possible transfusion adverse reactions. This viewpoint article approaches the potential of proteomics to investigate the impact of EVs in blood bank transfusion components, especially red blood cells and platelets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available